setproctitle(3bsd) | 3bsd | setproctitle(3bsd) |
setproctitle
— set
process title
library “libbsd”
#include
<unistd.h>
(See
libbsd(7) for include usage.)
void
setproctitle_init
(int
argc, char *argv[],
char *envp[]);
void
setproctitle
(const
char *fmt,
...);
The
setproctitle
()
library routine sets the process title that appears on the
ps(1) command.
The
setproctitle_init
()
library routine only needs to be called (before any call to
setproctitle
() and with
main
()
arguments), if the automatic constructor support has not been linked in
through the libbsd-ctor pkgconf file.
The title is set from the executable's name, followed by the result of a printf(3) style expansion of the arguments as specified by the fmt argument. If the fmt argument begins with a “-” character, the executable's name is skipped.
If fmt is NULL, the process title is restored.
To set the title on a daemon to indicate its activity:
setproctitle("talking to %s", inet_ntoa(addr));
The setproctitle
() function is implicitly
non-standard. Other methods of causing the
ps(1) command line to change, including
copying over the argv[0] string are also implicitly non-portable. It is
preferable to use an operating system supplied
setproctitle
() if present.
Unfortunately, it is possible that there are other calling
conventions to other versions of setproctitle
(),
although none have been found by the author as yet. This is believed to be
the predominant convention.
It is thought that the implementation is compatible with other systems, including NetBSD and BSD/OS.
The setproctitle
() function first appeared
in NetBSD 1.0 and FreeBSD
2.2. Other operating systems have similar functions.
The setproctitle_init
() function is a
libbsd extension not present on the BSDs; avoid using it in portable
code.
Peter Wemm ⟨peter@FreeBSD.org⟩ stole the idea from the Sendmail 8.7.3 source code by Eric Allman ⟨eric@sendmail.org⟩.
Never pass a string with user-supplied data as a format without
using ‘%s
’. An attacker can put format
specifiers in the string to mangle your stack, leading to a possible
security hole. This holds true even if the string was built using a function
like snprintf
(), as the resulting string may still
contain user-supplied conversion specifiers for later interpolation by
setproctitle
().
Always use the proper secure idiom:
setproctitle("%s",
string);
December 7, 2022 | x86_64 |